Science Says!
N—74
Welcome to Issue 74 of Science Says! Our weekly newsletter where you’ll learn the latest healthy aging and C15:0 research news that our team of doctors, scientists, and experts are most excited about—without having to go search for it.
Eric and Steph
Co-Founders, Doctors, Nerds
What Dr. Stephanie Venn-Watson, our co-founder and author of The Longevity Nutrient and over 80 peer-reviewed scientific publications, is reading.
When we talk about omega-3 supplements, many of us forget that we’re really talking about fish oil (or krill or algae oil).
This week, let’s talk about what’s in omega-3 fish oil supplements… and, perhaps just as importantly, what’s not. In addition to sharing scientific publications, we also did our own mini investigation using an independent, third-party lab. Bottom line – the news isn’t great.
Okay, so, what is in omega-3 fish oil supplements?
Well, in addition to omega-3s, studies have shown that most of these supplements contain cell-damaging lipid peroxidation. When fragile fats (aka omega-3s) in oils are exposed to oxygen, the result is lipid peroxidation. Since oxygen is hard to avoid, it probably isn’t surprising that most omega-3 fish oil supplements are already oxidized in the bottle. For example:
Yikes. That’s at least a 1 in 2 chance that any given omega-3 supplement is oxidized.
In addition to lipid peroxidation, fish oil supplements have many other fatty acids other than omega-3s. Mason et al. showed that omega-3 supplements have over 30 different fatty acids – and up to 36% of these fatty acids are known to be pro-inflammatory.
Now, what aren’t in omega-3 fish oil supplements?
Alas, omega-3s. Well, at least not as much omega-3s as what are listed on the label. In their study, Kleiner et al. tested 47 different omega-3 supplements and found that 79% of supplements had less EPA and 75% had less DHA than what was on the label. Similarly, Albert et al. found that 91% of 32 omega-3 fish oil supplements had lower-than-advertised EPA and DHA.
Worse yet, of the omega-3s that were present in supplements, those that had oxidized didn’t work. Specifically, Mason et al.’s study by the Brigham and Women’s Hospital showed that oxidized omega-3s were no longer able to prevent oxidation of bad LDL cholesterol (a key touted benefit of omega-3s).
Then, we did our own study.
As self-professed nerds, we went to our local grocery store and selected eight omega-3 supplements, including fish oil, algae oil, and krill oil supplements. We also included a couple of omega-3 gummy supplements. We sent these supplements, unopened, to an independent, third-party lab to test for lipid peroxidation and fatty acid content.
Here’s what we found:
These results are similar to what has been reported in the peer-reviewed literature. Which is why there have been calls for better quality control of omega-3 supplements.
This high variation in quality is likely also why the NIH has recently concluded that omega-3 fish (or algae or krill) oil supplements don’t effectively prevent heart disease – or much else.
The importance of purity to achieve efficacy: EPA and C15:0.
Purified prescription omega-3s. In their review titled “Critical differences between dietary supplement and prescription omega-3 fatty acids,” Hilleman et al. share that, while the science behind impure omega-3 fish oil supplements have been discouraging, outcomes have been more promising for purified omega-3 prescription therapeutics. Specifically, while there has been some controversy, most studies support that purified EPA (without DHA) therapeutics can prevent heart disease.
Pure C15:0 has 3x more cellular benefits than pure EPA. All the science shared above is why we developed fatty15 as a pure C15:0 supplement. While healthy fatty acids can be found in foods (be it fish oil for omega-3s or dairy fat for C15:0), the purer the fatty acid, the better it can work. We covered why pure C15:0 is better than dairy fat in last week’s Science Says!, but it’s worth repeating.
On top of all that, we tested fatty15 (pure C15:0) head-to-head against pure EPA and found that fatty15 had 36+ cellular benefits, which was 3x more than pure EPA.* We published this study in PLOS ONE, and you can read a blog on that study here.
To boot, when we sent our pure C15:0 fatty15 supplement to an independent third-party lab to test for lipid peroxidation, the results came back with a big fat(ty) ZERO. As expected of our pure and stable fatty acid powder, there was no lipid peroxidation across all three measurements.
Always nice to land with a happy ending. Have a great week, everyone!
An Amazon #1 Best Seller
A groundbreaking, once-in-a-century discovery that changes how we can age for the better.
Dr. Mark Hyman
15x New York Times bestseller
By clicking "Accept" you allow cookies that improve your experience on our site, help us analyze site performance and usage, and enable us to show relevant marketing content. See Privacy Policy