Home / Science Says! / N163 How Lowered Dairy Fat Intake Has Impacted Millennials and Zoomers Since Birth
Previous Mailing Back

Science Says!

N-163

How Lowered Dairy Fat Intake Has Impacted Millennials and Zoomers Since Birth

January 25, 2026

Welcome to Issue 163 of Science Says! Our weekly newsletter where you’ll learn the latest healthy aging and C15:0 research news that our team of doctors, scientists, and experts are most excited about—without having to go search for it.

Eric and Steph
Co-Founders, Doctors, Nerds

stephanie

What Dr. Stephanie Venn-Watson, our co-founder and author of The Longevity Nutrient and over 80 peer-reviewed scientific publications, is reading.

Healthy Aging

Generational Gaps In Healthy C15:0

The updated Dietary Guidelines for Americans (2026-2030) turned the food pyramid upside down. At the top? Whole fat dairy products, including cheese and whole fat milk, at the top. The reasoning? Whole fat dairy products can offer a suite of beneficial nutrients, including C15:0, that support our long-term health. Alas, these products also have high levels of some fats that are known to be proinflammatory.

A new peer-reviewed study was just published which evaluated fatty acid levels not only in whole fat cow’s milk, but milks from other ruminants. They also measured C15:0 in human milk and infant formulas. This week, let’s dive into how different milk sources stack up as they relate to C15:0… and how those levels have been changing over time.

So, which milks have the highest C15:0 levels?

Najjar et al. showed that, among ruminants, cow’s milk ruled the herd. Here’s a breakdown of the amount of C15:0 (based on the % among all fatty acids) measured in different whole fat milks:

  • Cow milk = 1.8%
  • Camel milk = 1.1%
  • Buffalo milk = 1.0%
  • Sheep milk = 0.8%
  • Goat milk = 0.8%

If you’re wondering about plant-based milks, so did Moore et al. This is what they found regarding C15:0 levels:

  • Rice milk = 0.05%
  • Soy milk = 0%
  • Coconut milk = 0%
  • Oat milk = 0%
  • Almond milk = 0%

So… whole fat cow’s milk is the best source of dietary C15:0, while plant-based milks basically don’t have C15:0. And if you happen to be drinking camel or buffalo milk, they come in a distant second place.

This is important because, as we have extensively shared, 100+ peer-reviewed studies support the long-term health benefits of C15:0 (check out all the studies at DiscoverC15.com/resources). And understanding where we can (and can’t) get our dietary C15:0 matters.

Our first dietary source of C15:0: Mom.

As a foundational nutrient, C15:0 should be in the first food we all get: mom-milk. Interestingly Najjar et al. showed, in their study, that there was no detectable C15:0 in human milk. The “interestingly” turns to “disturbingly” when we look at what prior studies have shown that measured C15:0 in mom’s milk.

  • Mom’s milk C15:0 levels depend on how much C15:0 mom eats. Yuan et al. showed that the more C15:0 a woman had in her diet, the higher the C15:0 in her milk. Specifically, the more cheese she ate, the more of that good C15:0 she provided to her baby. This benefit was not present if mom ate reduced-fat dairy products.
  • Modern-day moms have an average of 0.21% C15:0 in their milk. In a 2025 review paper, Yang et al. looked at C15:0 levels in mom’s milk, as reported in the recent, modern-day literature (2018-2023). Of 1,462 human milk samples, the average C15:0 level was 0.21% among all fatty acids.
  • Human milk C15:0 levels differ greatly by country. Back in 2006, Yuhas et al. measured C15:0 in human milk across nine countries. They found significant differences based on region, with Australian women’s milk having the highest C15:0 levels (0.39%) and China having the lowest (0.12%). American women had the third lowest C15:0 levels (0.29%).
  • Over 30 years ago, women who routinely ate dairy products had double the C15:0 levels (0.42%) in breastmilk compared to the average amounts today. Go back even further to 1991, and Dagnelie et al. showed that women who ate dairy products had C15:0 levels of 0.42% in their breastmilk. They also found that women who avoided dairy products had significantly lower C15:0 breastmilk levels – nearly half (0.22%)… which matches the average mom-milk C15:0 levels today.

So, to go from 0.42% of C15:0 in mom-milk during the 1990s to an average of 0.21% between 2018-2023 – and no C15:0 detected in the most recent study, these studies support that declining intake of whole fat dairy products (due in part to movement to plant-based milks) among moms has resulted in lower C15:0 levels in mom’s milk. A summary of data from most of the studies above, is provided below.

C15:0 content in breastmilk, by country (2006)

We care because higher C15:0 from mom is linked to better development in kiddos.

As we have shared in previous Science Says! issues, multiple studies have linked higher C15:0 from mom’s milk to better health in their children. For example:

  • George et al. showed that the higher the C15:0 in breastmilk fed to infants, the better the infant’s body growth and development, including head circumference.
  • Yuan et al. demonstrated that the higher the mom’s C15:0 levels in her red blood cells and milk during and after pregnancy, the better her child’s overall cognitive development and language skill development at ages 3 and 6 years old.
  • Duan et al. showed that C15:0 supplementation improved average daily body growth, mitochondrial function, and gut health in piglets, a common model used to understand human infant nutrition needs.

Combined, these studies support the need for 1) mom to get adequate C15:0 in her diet, to 2) help her baby get adequate C15:0 in their diet, to 3) enable both mom and baby to enjoy long and healthy lives.

Well, that seems important. What about C15:0 in infant formulas?

Good question! Here’s what a few studies have found:

  • Najjar et al. tested five different commercially available infant formulas and found that only one had measurable C15:0 levels (0.18% of total fatty acids). This particular formula had goat milk powder. Four out of five infant formulas tested had no measurable C15:0 levels. This isn’t much of a surprise, since these products contained either skim or nonfat (vs. whole fat) cow’s milk.
  • Purkiewicz et al. tested two infant formulas and showed that they only had C15:0 levels of 0.06% and 0.04%.
  • In their more extensive review including 99 infant formula samples, Yang et al. demonstrated that the mean C15:0 level was 0.19% – but with a high standard deviation of 0.19%.

These studies show that there is high variation of C15:0 levels in infant formulas, with many apparently having little to no C15:0. This is due to the increased use of nonfat and skim fat milk in lieu of whole fat cow’s milk in infant formulas.

Relevance to The Newly-Released Dietary Guidelines for Americans: 2026-2030.

While the new dietary guidelines aren’t perfect, mounting science continues to support the importance of C15:0 to not only our long-term cardiometabolic health as adults, but to our growth and development during our earliest years.

Understanding that:

  • Whole fat dairy is our primary dietary source C15:0;
  • Our movement away from whole fat dairy has resulted in lower C15:0 levels for us and our children;
  • Higher C15:0 is associated with supporting healthy growth and development in kids and long-term health in adults; and
  • Generations born since the 1990s have evidence of increasingly suboptimal cardiometabolic function,

It is hoped that getting C15:0 back into the lives of moms and children can have a meaningful positive impact on us now and for generations to come.

Have a fantastic week, everyone!

divider

Dive deeper into the science

Read these studies

Previous Mailing Back Previous Mailing Back on top
Download